人间正道是沧桑

514批次羽绒服抽检不合格：鸭鸭、迪卡侬、恒源祥等上榜，近三年羽绒服抽检合格率不足八成_我的网站

A |     On a balmy summer day in mid-August of 2021, the 20-year US-led nation-building project in Afghanistan came to an abrupt end. Following a 10-day blitzkrieg offensive in which the Taliban* captured 32 of the country’s 34 provinces with little resistance, the militants encircled and then entered Kabul and caused its government to flee, all while US and coalition forces, diplomats, and intelligence agents were still evacuating.,Afghanistan has been mired in foreign-backed civil conflict for generations, with the US-led invasion of the country in 2001 ensuing 23 years after the CIA kicked off Operation Cyclone - a covert action involving the deployment of jihadist fighters and tens of billions of dollars’ worth of weapons and cash to Afghanistan to fight a fledgling Soviet-backed government.,“We have to look at the history – the United States created the Afghan mujahedeen against the Soviet Union, when the Soviet Union came to help Afghanistan…That Islamic fundamentalism which includes Taliban, Mujahideen, ISIS [Daesh]** and others was created by the West,” says Dr. Zalmay Gulzad, a specialist on Afghan politics and professor of social sciences at Harold Washington College in Chicago.,WorldA Tale of Two Withdrawals: Why Soviet and US Pull-Outs From Afghanistan Were So Different18 August 2021, 04:00 GMT,In the mid-1990s, a few years after the end of the Cold War, Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security advisor to President Jimmy Carter, boasted that the overarching goal of the US project in Afghanistan was to “make the Soviets bleed for as much and as long as is possible,” and to coordinate with the intelligence services from the UK, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and other countries to make this happen.,Over four decades on, this strategy remains central to Washington’s calculations, Dr. Gulzad says, comparing US attempts to now use the Taliban to stir up trouble along Russia’s soft underbelly in Central Asia to the NATO proxy conflict against Moscow in Ukraine. Iran is another major target of US geopolitical ambitions, and Washington would like to play on the differences between the Sunni Taliban and the Shia Iranian state to “create problems” for the Islamic Republic, the academic argues.,Taliban Promise Safety for Resistance Leaders Including Ahmad Massoud as They Meet in Tehran10 January, 13:57 GMT,Graveyard of Empires,Brown University’s Costs of War project has calculated that the War in Afghanistan cost the United States alone more than $2.3 trillion, equivalent to $300 million per day for nearly 20 straight years. Notwithstanding the extravagant spending, and the rotational deployment of over 800,000 US troops and tens of thousands of personnel from over three dozen allied nations over the past generation, the Afghanistan project, once described by Harvard academic and chickenhawk Michael Ignatieff as a “humanitarian” “nation-building lite” adventure, has failed spectacularly.,The causes are legion, ranging from the pervasive corruption of Afghanistan’s political institutions and security structures (whose true fragility was demonstrated in August 2021), to the coalition’s tolerance for and even cooperation with unsavory warlords, drug traffickers, and even child sex criminals, and the imperious nature of the Western-backed project itself.,“It was a lost battle from the beginning,” says Dr. Swasti Rao, an associate fellow at the Europe and Eurasia Center at the Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses in New Delhi.,US 'Lost Track' of Afghan War Aims, Says Retired Marine General12 August, 17:00 GMT,“One of the problems with the US is that it wishes to see the entire world in its own mirror image, what is called the liberal world order comprising of free market and democracy. This approach has a problem when enforced top down without taking account the regional and grassroots realities, cultural sensibilities of the people at hand. The government of Ashraf Ghani was never a popular government with massive charges of corruption that the Afghan people did not identify with,” Rao explains.,The researcher noted that all around the world, but in West Asia in particular, the “project of the liberal order of which the US considers itself a custodian” has met with failure.,“After 20 years, about $2.5 trillion and the lives of its citizens and soldiers, the US realized that retreating is the best possible decision, something they had been planning for a long time,” Rao says.,Challenges, Opportunities,A year on from Kabul’s fall, the situation in Afghanistan is unstable, unpredictable, and dangerous, both for ordinary Afghans and for countries in the region.,“After one year of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Taliban takeover, it is Afghans who are suffering more than any other regional or extra-regional states,” says Shreyas Deshmukh, a researcher with the National Security Program at Delhi Policy Group, an India-based think tank.,“Now it is evident that the Taliban has not given up its extremist tendencies and will continue to stick with its interpretation of the extremist Sharia-based governance model. They do not have any concrete ideas to govern the state because [the Taliban] is a primarily insurgent organization. Therefore, anti-social elements including other terrorist organizations, drug lords, and human traffickers [have been] taking advantage of this vacuum. During the initial months after the Taliban takeover, the level of violence was reduced but now there is an uptick, as anti-Taliban forces are regrouping,” Deshmukh notes.,AfghanistanTaliban Militants Fire Into Air to Disperse Women's Protest in Kabul - Videos13 August, 07:44 GMT,The researcher points to an important dilemma for the Taliban: whether to make concessions on its governance model in exchange for cooperation with, assistance from, and possible recognition from other countries. Such a decision, Deshmukh notes, would carry with it the risk of heightening divisions within the Taliban’s ranks and even raise the possibility of their government’s collapse and renewed civil war. “On the contrary, if they implement a strict interpretation of Sharia law while going against international norms then the country will once again become a haven for terrorist organizations,” he warns.,Dr. Rao concurs with this pessimistic appraisal of Afghanistan’s internal situation, noting that while the Taliban proved capable of taking over from the Western-backed government, “they do not know how to engage in governance per se, let alone [create an] inclusive government with minorities and women. It’s been a year of denial of women’s rights, media crackdown, and retaliatory killings amid mass hunger. Especially with the Taliban bringing back the feared Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, enforcing the group’s austere interpretation of Islam, it is more unlikely that women or minorities might have a say in the government any time in the foreseeable future,” he says.,Worse yet, Rao says, if the situation continues to fester, it will cause “even more unrest, drugs and illegal weapons smuggling, bloody fights between various fundamentalist groups like ISIS-K and the Taliban; in short a situation that will remain a regional security [concern] with uncontrolled global ramifications.”,The scholar emphasizes that the international community has asked the Taliban to form an inclusive government, ensure the rights of women and minorities, and guarantee that Afghanistan will no longer serve as a launch pad for global terror operations. “Unless that happens, the trade or investment promised by China will not flow. It is important to note that even Russia and China, which share a better equation with the Taliban compared to the Western world, have not recognized their government,” Rao believes.,WorldLithium, Gold & Rare Earths: How China May Open the Door to New Business Opportunities for Afghans19 August 2021, 08:38 GMT,At the same time, the researcher notes that although the US withdrawal exacerbated regional chaos, landed sophisticated weapons in Taliban hands, and created a regional power vacuum, it also “created space for countries like Russia, China and Iran to play a far more decisive role in the region,” as Washington shifted its attention to Eastern Europe and China.,Deshmukh concurs. “The Taliban is not a designated terrorist organization by many states including the US. However, its leadership is under UNSC and US sanctions. The real question is, will the countries recognize the Taliban regime in the near future? China, Pakistan, Russia, and Qatar have given some signals that they might recognize the regime. However, it remains a risky business considering that the Taliban is continuing close cooperation with terrorist organizations like AQ, Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan and Lashkar-e-Taiba. Many of their leaders have taken safe haven in Afghanistan.”,“No country would like to align itself with this regime and recognize them, for now. Meanwhile, they will continue to engage with the Taliban to provide humanitarian assistance to Afghans, keep a tab on terrorist elements which could threaten the national interest of those countries, and further to reap some economic benefits from Afghanistan,” Deshmukh concludes.,* A group under United Nations sanctions for terrorist activities.,** A terrorist group outlawed in Russia and many other countries.。    天气渐冷，又到了选购羽绒服的季节。市面上羽绒服种类众多，价格不一，又涉及“含绒量”“绒子含量”“充绒量”“蓬松度”等专业指标，消费者应该怎么选呢？哪些指标值得注意？哪些品牌曾被监管部门抽检出不合格？近期，《消费者报道》整理了国家市场监督管理总局及各省市级市场监督管理局于近3年发布的羽绒服抽检情况。近三年羽绒服抽检合格率不足八成。结果显示，2022年1月—2024年12月，监管部门共抽检羽绒服2006批次，发现514批次不合格，不合格率为25.6%，其中鸭鸭、迪卡侬、恒源祥等品牌上榜，不合格项目主要为纤维成分及含量、绒子含量、含绒量、充绒量等。514批次羽绒服不合格，涉及鸭鸭、迪卡侬、恒源祥等大牌根据2024年京东11.11全周期销售数据，10月14日晚8点至11月11日晚，女士羽绒服、男士羽绒服、皮草成交额同比增长翻倍。

B | 其中，女士羽绒服的销量增幅达到了惊人的135%。羽绒服卖得越来越好，但不合格情况依然让人揪心。据《消费者报道》统计，过去三年（2022年1月—2024年12月），国家市场监督管理总局及各省市级市场监督管理局共抽检2006批次羽绒服，其中514批次不合格，整体合格率约为74.4%。品牌方面，有不少大牌或相关生产企业的羽绒服被检出不合格的情况，包括鸭鸭、迪卡侬、恒源祥等部分批次羽绒服。热销品牌鸭鸭有2批次不合格2023年2月，湖南省市场监督管理局发布关于2022年第三批重点工业产品质量省级监督抽查情况的通报。通报显示，1批次标称由“鸭鸭股份公司”生产的“鸭鸭”羽绒服装（货号：YE2B604281Z）被检出不合格，不合格项目为充绒量。2022年8月，江苏省市场监督管理局发布关于LED照明产品等55种产品质量省级监督抽查情况的通报。通报显示，1批次标称由“鸭鸭股份公司”生产的“YAYA鸭鸭”羽绒服（货号：B58991）被检出不合格，不合格项目为含绒量、绒子含量、蓬松度。鸭鸭官网显示，鸭鸭品牌成立于1972年，已有52年发展历史，宣称是“中国羽绒服首创者”“中国第一件羽绒服的制造者”，产品涵盖男士、女士、儿童等人群。根据公开资料，2019年到2023年，鸭鸭羽绒服的GMV从8000万元飙升到近200亿元，大涨超百倍。

C | 近两年，鸭鸭频频在“代言人营销”上发力。

D | 据剁椒统计，2023年鸭鸭合作的艺人达11个，包括王一博、佟丽娅、海清、万茜、陈哲远、王鹤润等。2023年11月8日，鸭鸭官宣王一博成为其羽绒服首席代言人当日，鸭鸭达成线上全渠道交易总额达2亿＋、抖音单日女装TOP1、全天猫服饰直播TOP1、天猫男装TOP1、天猫女装羽绒服TOP1、天猫男装羽绒服TOP1等多项“成就”。2024年11月，YAYA鸭鸭正式官宣王一博为其品牌全球首席代言人。▲YAYA鸭鸭官网记者注意到，在电商平台上，鸭鸭羽绒服的销量不错，定价颇为亲民，销量较大的几款羽绒服价格在109元~609元之间。例如，某款宣称为“王一博同款”的长款羽绒服价格为499元。《消费者报道》记者发现，这几款销量较大的羽绒服宣称的含绒量均为90%及以上，绒子含量为90%-95%。

E | 鸭鸭官网喊出的口号也是“天生骄傲，鸭鸭90绒”“90%高含绒量”。但从抽检结果来看，鸭鸭的不合格项目涉及含绒量、绒子含量等。就抽检不合格及“代言人营销”等问题，《消费者报道》给鸭鸭官方邮箱发去采访函，但截至发稿未收到回复。迪卡侬、恒源祥纤维含量指标不合格2023年2月， 杭州市市场监督管理局发布关于 2022 年第二批市级产品质量监督抽查情况的通报。

F | 通报显示，1批次标称由“迪脉（上海）企业管理有限公司”生产、受检单位名称为“迪卡侬（杭州）体育用品有限公司”的羽绒服装（羽绒服）被抽检发现不合格，不合格项目为绒子含量。2022年10月，山东省市场监督管理局发布2022年羽绒服装产品质量省级监督抽查结果。抽查结果显示，1批次标称由“迪脉（上海）企业管理有限公司”生产、企业名称为“迪卡侬（上海）体育用品有限公司淄博鲁泰大道分公司”的羽绒服（生产日期或批号为4396009）被抽检发现不合格，不合格项目为纤维含量。迪卡侬是全球知名的连锁体育用品品牌。公开资料显示，2003年迪卡侬进入中国，至2021年已遍布全国46座城市178家商场。2024年，全球品牌价值500强名单发布，迪卡侬排名第230位。在某电商平台的“迪卡侬旗舰店”上，迪卡侬的羽绒服售价从两百元到上千元不等，其中销量最高的一款羽绒外套价格为449.35元，总销量高达20万+。无独有偶，同样出现纤维含量指标不合格的还有“恒源祥”羽绒服。2023年2月，湖南省市场监督管理局 发布关于2022年第三批重点工业产品质量省级监督抽查情况的通报。

G | 通报显示，1批次标称商标持有人为“恒源祥（集团）有限公司/上海彩羊服饰有限公司”的“Fazeya恒源祥”羽绒服装（货号：caiyang-1212P23）被检出不合格，不合格项目为纤维含量。消费者对于“恒源祥”的认知可能来自于“恒源祥，羊羊羊”的广告。

H | 恒源祥官网显示，其创立于1927年的中国上海。2005年12月22日，恒源祥集团正式成为2008年北京奥运会赞助商。

I | 2024年 ，恒源祥再次签约成为国际奥委会官方正装供应商。

J | 目前，其产品涵盖绒线、针织、服饰、家纺、童装等大类。

K | 记者在电商平台上搜索“恒源祥羽绒服”发现，恒源祥羽绒服的销量并不高，销量大多为几十，售价从一百多到几百元不等。迪卡侬、恒源祥羽绒服被抽检通报的“纤维含量”不合格，该指标是什么意思呢？纤维含量指的是衣服所使用的纤维原料和比例，该指标主要考核服装实际的纤维成分及含量与标注是否相符。例如某款服装标注纤维含量为棉90%，实际检测结果为棉70%，标注与实测值不符。产品纤维含量标注不正确或不规范会影响消费者对产品价值、性能的判定以及维护保养方式的选择。

L | 纤维含量、绒子含量、含绒量是不合格重灾区《消费者报道》分析羽绒服抽检数据发现，不合格项目主要集中在纤维含量、绒子含量、含绒量上，三个项目的不合格次数之和约占不合格次数统计总和的7成。羽绒服最重要的性能无疑是保暖。羽绒服的保暖主要来源于里面填充的鸭绒或鹅绒。而鸭绒、鹅绒的充绒量（羽绒重量多少克）、含绒量（绒子、绒丝百分比）、绒子含量（绒子百分比）等直接决定了羽绒服的保暖性能。

M | 消费者应该如何理解充绒量、含绒量、绒子含量这三个指标呢？第三方检测机构一名负责羽绒服检测的工程师向《消费者报道》记者表示：“充绒量指的就是羽绒服中填充的全部羽绒的重量；含绒量指的是绒子、绒丝在羽毛羽绒中的含量百分比；绒子含量指的绒子在羽毛羽绒中的含量百分比。目前新国标中只有绒子含量要求，已经没有含绒量指标，绒子含量要求会更严格。”所谓绒子，就是长在鸭鹅等脖子到胸腹之间不含羽梗的毛，这部分的绒毛细、软、长，用来填充羽绒制品更保暖。对于消费者，可以留意羽绒服标签来辨别，充绒量在标签上通常用“克（g）”来标示，而含绒量、绒子含量的单位是百分比。一家国内羽绒服行业从业人员向《消费者报道》记者透露：“绒子含量等指标目前的检测过程还是以人工为主：检测人员需把样品中的绒子、绒丝、毛片、羽丝和杂质等通过人工方式分别拣出，计算绒子的含量百分比，分拣过程中可能出现人工误差。”▲羽绒服吊牌上的“绒子含量”和“含绒量”标称值得一提的是，2022年4月1日，羽绒服国家标准GB/T 14272-2021《羽绒服装》开始实施，代替2011年旧国标。新国标明确羽绒服标注“绒子含量”，以替代“含绒量”，并明确绒子含量明示值不低于50%的才算是羽绒服，同时也对绒丝和羽丝含量作出限制。例如，新国标GB/T 14272-2021《羽绒服装》规定，羽绒服产品的充绒量与明示值的偏差不小于-5.0%。绒子含量90%的羽绒服的绒子含量允许偏差≥-5%。《消费者报道》选购建议（1）认准标签的“充绒量”“绒子含量”“蓬松度”指标。充绒量、绒子含量、蓬松度的高低，直接影响羽绒服的保暖性。

N | 企业应明确标注填充物（如鸭绒、鹅绒）、充绒量、绒子含量以及执行标准代号等重要信息。

o | （2）认准新国标GB/T 14272-2021《羽绒服装》。

p | 2021年3月9日，GB/T 14272-2021《羽绒服装》正式发布，并于2022年4月1日正式实施。新国标已经没有“含绒量”的定义，使用的是“绒子含量”指标。建议消费者选购时，认准新国标或绒子含量指标。（3）绒子含量以70%及以上为佳。

q | 绒子含量明示值不低于50%的才算是羽绒服，而绒子含量达到70%时，羽绒服装已具备较不错的保暖性能。羽绒的绒子含量数值尾数都是0或5，不存在100%的情况，如：80%、95%等。来源：消费者报道 B48。

Current article:http://dntj5w.chuaiguonengdonggai.buzz/9vb/20260826/2463717.html

Published on:22:19:11